Shoppers of legal tech are switching on to smarter fraud defences , firms, insurers and in-house teams are tuning into Fraud Rely, a new anti-fraud intelligence platform launched by law firm Weightmans in collaboration with global analytics leader Verisk, and it could reshape how organisations meet the new failure-to-prevent-fraud rules.
Essential takeaways
- New partnership: Weightmans is the first UK legal firm to team up with Verisk to deliver a bespoke anti-fraud platform, Fraud Rely, combining legal expertise with analytics.
- Regulatory driver: The Economic Crime & Corporate Transparency Act 2023 introduces a corporate offence for failure to prevent fraud, making robust tech a practical compliance step.
- What it does: The platform screens claims and flags suspicious patterns, from opportunistic attempts to organised rings, using data links and analytics.
- User benefits: Clients can expect earlier risk detection, a clearer prioritisation of high-risk cases, and evidence-led outputs helpful for defensible decision-making.
- Sensory note: The interface is described as intuitive, focusing teams on the highest-risk items rather than drowning them in noise.
Why a law firm is building an anti-fraud platform , and why that feels smart
It’s striking to see a traditional law firm like Weightmans put technology front and centre of its fraud offering; the move feels practical, not flashy, with a clean, focused aim to catch suspicious activity earlier. According to Weightmans and Verisk, Fraud Rely pairs Weightmans’ fraud dataset with Verisk’s analytics to give clients actionable intelligence. That combination matters because legal teams bring context and defensible processes, while analytics bring scale and pattern recognition.
For firms and insurers, that’s useful: legal expertise shapes which leads are worth pursuing, and the tech reduces time wasted on low-risk work. Expect this to be one of those sensible adjacencies where two strengths make a stronger end product.
The regulatory push: ECCTA and why technology is now baseline
The Economic Crime & Corporate Transparency Act 2023 introduced a corporate criminal offence for failure to prevent fraud. That’s not just a headline , it changes the compliance bar for many organisations, who now need to show reasonable prevention measures. Government factsheets explain the new duties and why proportionate systems matter. In practice, that means automated detection and logging of suspicious activity looks like the minimum standard for firms worried about liability.
So, Fraud Rely arrives at a moment when investment in anti-fraud tech is often less optional and more strategic.
How Fraud Rely actually helps teams do their job better
The platform is designed to spot links between parties and detect patterns that aren’t obvious on single claims. That’s the real value: finding connections across datasets so investigators can prioritise cases that matter. Users will likely appreciate fewer false leads and a clearer view of organised versus opportunistic activity.
Practical tip: when you evaluate similar platforms, ask how they combine raw analytics with sector-specific intelligence and whether outputs can be exported to your case management or compliance logs for audit trails.
Why Verisk’s role matters , data and defensibility
Verisk is known in insurance circles for deep analytics and broad industry datasets, and their technology sits at the engine of Fraud Rely. That gives the platform a layer of credibility for insurers and claim handlers who need evidence-led insight. According to Verisk’s managing director for the UK and Ireland, the aim is earlier, more accurate intelligence to stay ahead of sophisticated threats.
That said, buyers should probe data provenance and refresh cadence , strong models need current, relevant inputs, and defensible outcomes require clear documentation of how conclusions were reached.
What firms and in-house teams should consider next
If you’re choosing anti-fraud tools, start with a risk-first approach: define the types of fraud that hit you hardest, the volume you handle, and how investigative resource is deployed. Look for platforms that prioritise explainability , you want to justify decisions internally and, if needed, to regulators. And don’t neglect integration: the best analytic insight still needs to plug into workflows.
A practical starter: run a short pilot on historical claims to see how many high-risk links the platform surfaces and whether investigators agree with the prioritisation.
It’s a small change that can make every fraud alert more defensible and less of a guessing game.
Source Reference Map
Story idea inspired by: [1]
Sources by paragraph:
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The article was published on 6 May 2026, indicating recent and original content. No evidence of prior publication or recycling found.
Quotes check
Score:
10
Notes:
Direct quotes from Chris Sawford and Mike Brown are present. No discrepancies or prior appearances of these quotes identified.
Source reliability
Score:
7
Notes:
The article is from Legal Futures, a UK-based legal news outlet. While it is a reputable source within the legal industry, it is not as widely recognised as major news organisations. The content appears to be original reporting rather than a press release.
Plausibility check
Score:
9
Notes:
The collaboration between Weightmans and Verisk to launch ‘Fraud Rely’ aligns with recent industry trends towards integrating advanced analytics in fraud detection. The Economic Crime & Corporate Transparency Act 2023 supports the plausibility of this development. No conflicting information found.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The article presents original, recent, and plausible information about the collaboration between Weightmans and Verisk to launch the ‘Fraud Rely’ platform. The content is well-sourced, with direct quotes from both parties involved, and is freely accessible without paywall restrictions. While the source is reputable within the legal industry, it is not as widely recognised as major news organisations, which slightly affects the overall assessment. However, given the corroborating details and the absence of significant concerns, the content passes the fact-check with high confidence.