Demo

Business Secretary Peter Kyle warns that Nigel Farage’s Reform UK embodies the politics of Enoch Powell, amid concerns over the rise of far-right movements linked to economic stagnation and social unrest.

Business Secretary Peter Kyle has drawn a blatant comparison between Nigel Farage and Enoch Powell, describing Farage as “today’s incarnation of the politics of Enoch Powell.” Speaking at the Co-operative Party conference, Kyle branded Farage’s party, Reform UK, as “far right” and warned that the party’s popularity is becoming dangerously intertwined with the UK’s sluggish economic recovery. He claimed that without meaningful and sustained economic growth, rebuilding trust in our democracy and governance is virtually unattainable, an alarming indication that economic stagnation continues to fuel the divisive, xenophobic rhetoric of far-right factions.

Kyle’s comments echo long-standing concerns about the resurgence of nationalist extremism, drawing uncomfortable parallels between Reform UK and notorious far-right groups like the National Front and the BNP. He pointed to the ongoing economic malaise as a key driver behind the rise of these hateful movements. Referencing Powell’s infamous 1968 “rivers of blood” speech, which stoked racial tensions, Kyle suggested that Farage’s divisive approach mirrors similar sentiments rooted in economic frustration and social discontent.

Recent controversies surrounding Reform UK’s appointment of Matthew Goodwin as its honorary president for the new student organisation, Students4Reform, further underline this troubling trend. Goodwin, a prominent figure in hard-right activism, has previously caused outrage with statements questioning the Britishness of UK-born minorities. Such remarks have been condemned across the political spectrum, notably by Liberal Democrat MP Max Wilkinson, who called Goodwin’s comments “a disgrace” and demanded his removal. Goodwin insists his views are not racist, dismissing accusations as misused attempts to silence legitimate debate.

Kyle’s condemnation comes amid his earlier criticisms of Farage and others opposing the government’s Online Safety Act. He implied that opponents of the legislation were effectively defending online predators, linking their opposition to a broader pattern of moral and social decline. This narrative, championed by far-right factions, seeks to distract from the real issues of economic mismanagement and societal instability that continue to undermine the fabric of our country.

This episode highlights the persistent danger posed by narratives that thrive on economic hardship and identity politics. The government’s emphasis on economic regeneration is a clear acknowledgment that without addressing the root causes of public disillusionment, skyrocketing costs, unemployment, and social fragmentation, far-right rhetoric will only grow more influential. Such sentiments threaten to undermine the very foundations of our democracy, and it is only through honest criticism and decisive action that we can prevent these divisive forces from further gaining ground.

Source: Noah Wire Services

Noah Fact Check Pro

The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.

Freshness check

Score:
10

Notes:
The narrative is fresh, published on 15 November 2025, with no prior appearances found.

Quotes check

Score:
10

Notes:
The direct quotes from Peter Kyle are unique to this report, with no earlier matches found.

Source reliability

Score:
10

Notes:
The narrative originates from The Guardian, a reputable UK news outlet, enhancing its credibility.

Plausability check

Score:
10

Notes:
The claims made are plausible and align with known political dynamics, with no inconsistencies or unverifiable entities identified.

Overall assessment

Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS

Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH

Summary:
The narrative is fresh, with unique quotes from a reputable source, and presents plausible claims without inconsistencies or unverifiable entities.

[elementor-template id="4515"]
Share.